author photo

Yenisel Rodriguez Perez: I have lived in Cuba my entire life, except for several months in 2013 when I was in Miami with my father. Despite the 90 miles that separate Havana and Miami, I find profound reasons in both for political and community activism. My encounter with socio-cultural anthropology eight years ago prepared me for a commitment of love for cultural diversity.

Internet for Everyone in Cuba: Myth and Reality

March 1, 2016 |

Yenisel Rodriguez Perez

internet (3)HAVANA TIMES — It looks as though definitive steps will finally be taken to make Internet services widely accessible in Cuba. Much pressure has built up around this issue, so we can imagine a heated dispute between different power groups on the island behind the scenes.

Is there anyone who doubts cyberspace is the political stage where the country’s sociopolitical and economic future will be defined?

To speak of a Cuban civil society and to assign it a leading role in this struggle is to be naïve. “Civil society” is still a euphemism in Cuba.

The concept of “civil society” is used to refer to actions by the people aimed at applying pressure on the government, initiatives that are minimally effective, undertaken by individuals or small groups, all minorities and invisible at neighborhood level.

Despite having defined political aims, these initiatives do not have much of a sociopolitical impact owing to the atomization of our society and the high level of depoliticization that characterizes the popular imaginary.

It would be more exact to conceive of interest groups associated to power centers (and this may still be too optimistic), because, beyond all other considerations, it is undeniable that the steps being taken to make Internet services widely accessible reflect the consolidation of neoliberal and pro-right tendencies in Cuba’s political panorama.

We could think of a map that locates a passive and a leading opposition, distinguishing those who long for the kind of total connectivity that would facilitate the complete overthrow of the Castro regime, in the style of the Arab Spring.

Then we have those who are solely interested in preserving the status quo, on the basis of disinformation and the centralization of global information flows, represented by the government gerontocracy and its lackeys.

Last but not least, the reformists come into the scene, interested in more or less broad and orderly reforms in connection to Internet access, calling for efficient and “democratic” government control, longing for that center-right capitalism that is unfeasible in a world shaken by all manner of crises.

I wonder about the revolutionary left, about Cuban anarchism. Is there a road traced by resistance and recycling, through which we could direct all our strength to move towards a future of greater access to global networks? Will we be able to take advantage of the cracks left by the powerful in their political games and the struggle of all against all?

Personally, I have been adjusting my expectations in connection with these matters. I know the Internet is not a magic lamp that grants us three wishes, much less when such wishes have political ends.

Technology may set its sights on the distant horizon, but, ultimately, it is anchored to daily social relations, which we may ironically call “analogic.”

What we are unable to address through social praxis, in the face-to-face dealings among individuals, before the social institutions of immediate surroundings, no Facebook, Twitter or Saint Google is going to solve.

I have come across little political culture on the Internet. On the contrary, I have run into the same realities I can see through my window, on any street in my dirty and poetic neighborhood: plenty of gossiping and plenty of cussing.

Let us aim our weapons well!

Share this:

What's your opinion?

  • Moses Patterson

    Weird. It’s 2016 and Yenisel is still speculating about the pros and cons of the internet. Welcome to the 21st century Cuba.

  • George

    This is probably not what the bureaucrats and censors want to here but I’m going to say it anyway. The internet revolution is being eroded by capitalism. Mesh-networks are being replaced with Star-networks, i.e. networks in which there is no central node are being replaced by networks which require authorisation by a central node. This is spelled out by Dmytri Kleiner in his online lecture “peer to peer communism vs the client-server state”: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=112d45b03hM
    The erosion is not due to technology, but rather effort. Private companies have put more effort into designing the internet of the future than the collective commons. Star-networks are necessary to create profit, so private companies like Facebook, Twitter, Amazon etc. have developed Star-network services. None of these services require star-networks except for the purposes of profit. All these services, if they had been developed by the creative-commons could be not-for-profit mesh networks.
    The challenge for cyber anarchists is to develop mesh-network alternatives to these star-networks. This is inline with the Revolution’s ideals, and Cubans are well placed to develop these. However it goes totally against the bureaucracy and censors, so much as the free-software movement in Cuba has been side-lined, I expect mesh-networks to be side-lined as well. To allow Cuba to lead the way in mesh-network services requires the government to trust the Cuban people and the Cuban people to have sufficiently developed sense of commitment to communism.

    • Ryan Ross

      Interesting. I looked for the Kleiner video referenced above, and it is unavailable due to the fact that “the Youtube account associated with the video has been terminated.”